Something went wrong
Try again later.
Tron
The life of Kevin Flynn, a computer programmer who has been hijacked by a software pirate who makes him trapped in the internet, has been changed completely, as he suffers from the terrible he has, as he finds himself trapped in the internet and the only way to survive is to receive help from master of security programmer.
23 October 1943, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
14 May 1953, Lubbock, Texas, USA
8 October 1954, Redondo Beach, California, USA
19 December 1935, Queens, New York, USA
16 July 1915, Bedford Hills, New York, USA
September 05, 2013
essential 80s, and it's glorious in that respect
October 23, 2004
A dazzling movie from Walt Disney in which computers have been used to make themselves romantic and glamorous. Here's a technological sound-and-light show that is sensational and brainy, stylish, and fun.
April 07, 2011
For most people, TRON's importance is as a historical footnote. It's the Model T of our CGI age. But the film's fans are passionate ones.
April 02, 2014
Dazzling but lightweight.
June 04, 2007
Tron is loaded with visual delights but falls way short of the mark in story and viewer involvement.
April 02, 2014
It may seem somewhat dated these days, but it would probably be fair to credit this Disney movie with being the forerunner of the Toy Story movies.
August 30, 2004
Its computer sequences exist in a blue-gray scheme filled with flashing lights, speeding objects and dizzying motion. Its visual effects are wonderfully new. They are also numbing after a while.
April 02, 2014
The visuals were groundbreaking and the famous light-cycle sequence is undeniably cool, but the years haven't been kind to the tech-talk script or offensive synth-mongous soundtrack.
June 24, 2006
Tron never reaches a level of excitement commensurate with its effects budget.
April 02, 2014
Seeing it is like spending two hours in a hardware store gussied up with streamers and flashing lights. It's different, but it's not entertainment.
May 05, 2015
While its visual effects have aged laughably poorly, the movie can be quite lovely to look at, particularly since its CGI isn't trying to represent anything more realistic than 1982-era CGI.
June 04, 2007
It's a simple idea that ought to serve, but Lisberger's failures of pacing, structure, variation, and characterization ultimately make the film seem monotonous and distant.
